Boston Police spying on peace activists: what’s the big deal?
Please note that by playing this clip YouTube and Google will place a long term cookie on your computer.
Please note that by playing this clip YouTube and Google will place a long term cookie on your computer.
Today, the ACLU of Massachusetts launched its report about the spying on lawful protest activity by the Boston Police and the agents attached to its fusion center, one of those domestic surveillance hubs set up in the aftermath of 9/11 to share “terrorism-related” information.
Please note that by playing this clip YouTube and Google will place a long term cookie on your computer.
If you thought – as we did – that some time would elapse before the government would challenge the September 12th ruling issued by Judge Katherine Forrest striking down indefinite detention, you would be wrong.
Image of protest courtesy the Bradley Manning Support Network
“Courts must safeguard core constitutional rights.”
Using such unwavering language, US district judge Katherine Forrest has refused to bend to the Obama Administration that appointed her to the federal bench.
Here's a study in contrast: The Obama administration's Department of Justice is prosecuting someone for telling the public about CIA torture, and has let the CIA off the hook entirely not only for its torture regime but also for the killing of detainees in its custody.
Disclosures about torture are unacceptable. The torture (leading to death) itself? No matter.
Please note that by playing this clip YouTube and Google will place a long term cookie on your computer.
President Obama courageously signed the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act on New Years' Eve, when most adults in the United States were probably in some state of inebriation. That particular version of the routine military funding bill allows the government to indefinitely detain people accused of being militants in the broadly defined war on terror against al Qaeda and "associated forces."